How much land the federal government should own or be limited to, is a seperate question. To address that specific issue, I would support a constitutional amendment that limits the federal government to owning no more that 20% of the land mass of a state.
But to the point of this rancher’s case, asserting squater’s rights and then attepting to manipulate the press with misleading statements as Bundy has done in this situation, is not the right way to go about addressing the situation.
So what is the BEST way?
A list of BETTER ways?
It's the ONLY question. .mil bases, post roads, and DC. That's all that's listed in the Constitution.
Keep on supporting the FedGov though. "Go Team! Burn those 'squatters' out!"