Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, I Hate the Cable Company Too
Townhall.com ^ | April 9, 2014 | John Ransom

Posted on 04/09/2014 5:49:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

Heavyweight conservatives and banterweight conservatives are lining up on both sides the Comcast/Time Warner merger.

The heavyweights, which include Grover Norquist at Americans for Tax Reform, Wayne Crews at the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Duane Parde at the National Taxpayers Union, have penned a letter to influential Senators including Mike Lee, Chuck Grassley and Ted Cruz, urging them to look past the politics and approve the merger between the two cable giants on traditional grounds—you know, the grounds under which the anti-trust laws were written and passed in the first place?

“As advocates for a free market,” the heavyweights write, “we believe that the Sherman and Clayton antitrust laws require the government to abstain from intervening in such transactions on antitrust grounds absent any clear showing of actual or potential market failure of which there is none here.”

And they are right.

Let me make it clear: I don’t like Comcast’s politics. I once ran a company that was a competitor to Comcast and know full well what they can do to the competition. And I think they are at the sleazy end of the K Street shuffle.

But none of those reasons are reason enough for anti-trust policies to apply.

Anti-trust laws were created to prevent any company from so dominating the marketplace that they could damage competitive pricing for consumers. They were created to make sure that business combinations didn’t unfairly cooperate on prices too.

On both counts the Comcast/Time Warner merger clears the hurdle.

We have become so accustomed in this country, on both sides of the aisle, that all is fair in love and war and politics, that we have forgotten that laws are not meant to be used as hammers against people we disagree with, but rather are made to be enforced, under the Constitution for the expressed purpose for which they are enacted.

And those protections should apply to everyone.

The bantamweighters, which include Judson Phillips with Tea Party Nation, Colin Hanna with Let Freedom Ring and Stephen Demaura with Americans for Job Security, are arguing that Comcast and Time Warner merger would provide less diversity of thought, amongst other things, which is not what the law was meant to ensure.

They cite the First Amendment to the Constitution as a “guarantee of a diversity of viewpoints.”

The First Amendment does no such thing as guarantee diversity of thought. Only a liberal would argue such. Their argument is not just wrong historically, but a very different plain meaning than our Founders intended for the First Amendment.

In essence, the arguments the "liberty" people make are political arguments that conservative interests might be harmed by the merger.

It always pains me when I have to point out to good, faithful conservatives that they didn’t invent the Constitution even if some of them just discovered it six years ago.

In their discovery, they should be careful not to twist it as our liberal friends would do.

The Comcast/Time Warner deal might have some hidden problems that the Senate Judiciary Committee will have to sort out.

But from here, it looks like neither the Sherman and Clayton anti-trust provisions nor the First Amendment to the Constitution would be violated.

I’m not a big fan of cable either.

But if you have problem with it you can change the channels just as well at DirecTV.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: banterweight; chuckgrassley; comcast; comcasttwc; doj; duaneparde; firstamendment; grovernorquist; johnransom; mikelee; tedcruz; timewarnercable; twc; waynecrews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: afraidfortherepublic

Thanks.
Comcast is adding ISP in May and I just checked out Ovation and The Artful Detective will be on at 12mn tonight.
I’ll DVR the program.


41 posted on 04/09/2014 9:20:07 AM PDT by peteyd (A dog may bite you in the ass,but it will never stab you in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: duckman

We also have charter cable, but I remember when you could watch cable TV without needing a box as long as your TV was cable ready


42 posted on 04/09/2014 10:01:58 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

Our local power utility has also fiber optic cable. We used to subscribe to it for about a couple of years, but they kept having problems so that we we went back to Charter again.


43 posted on 04/09/2014 10:07:11 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: peteyd

I hope you like it as much as we do. You have to watch the whole thing (and several episodes) to catch the humor and the subtlties.

Basically, he’s shy and he’s in love with the coroner, bt he’s always late in declaring his love and she goes off to do something else. He’s carrying a ring around in his pocket. She comes back, but I don’t know where it will end. My daughter won’t tell me, because she doesn’t want to spoil the story line.

A recurring pair of characters in the series seem to be a wealthy couple named “The Pendricks” who have a lot of influence around town. Murdoch thinks that James Pendrick is responsible for a murder for which they were never able to convict him. The Pendricks appear in about a quarter of the episodes I’ve seen.

Another feature of this series is that real historical characters appear from time to time as part of the story — Houdini, H.G. Wells, Tesla come to mind.


44 posted on 04/09/2014 10:23:24 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wheelman81
Actually, you can subscribe to on-line access to all NFL games

Where do you get that ? I want to disconnect DISH, but hubby likes his football even though we don't get much with DISH so having on-line access would be great.

Any help would be appreciated --- thanks

45 posted on 04/09/2014 10:34:54 AM PDT by coder2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Amazon is pushing streaming hard!

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00CX5P8FC/?tag=googhydr-20&ref=km_D1GOnzgQQ8Y5t9P9+AyZpw==&kw=fire%20tv


46 posted on 04/09/2014 11:40:52 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and is not afraid of the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

Get an antenna and, Roku,G-box MX2,Pivos,Ouya,Apple TV,or Fire TV and kiss cable goodbye.


47 posted on 04/09/2014 11:50:26 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and is not afraid of the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

And learn how to but XBMC on those streaming boxes!!

Just google it.


48 posted on 04/09/2014 11:51:26 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and is not afraid of the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I’ve never had cable - use the digital converter box and bunny ears. I’m not sure what Roku is - does it let you get free TV? My biggest issue is that I’m going to be moving and don’t want to keep the landline....which means I’ll have to find a free-standing DSL so that I can do the internet. Or else maybe I’ll look into Straighttalk for a home phone “line” and resubscribe to Netzero DSL. But I’m sick of the high Verizon bills for a landline when I hardly call anyone.


49 posted on 04/09/2014 12:24:42 PM PDT by midnightcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: midnightcat

Roku basically sits between your internet connection and your TV. You are basically streaming content through the Internet and having it display on your TV. Roku offers an interface for that. Once you hook it up, you can access the home page on your TV and use the remote to add internet channels as you see fit. Some of the channels you need to pay for such as Netflix and Hulu Plus. Many are free.

I also disconnected my landline and use cellphones or Skype only.


50 posted on 04/09/2014 1:03:25 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Mine dropped the YES Network on 3/31/14 the day before Opening Day.
51 posted on 04/09/2014 1:05:00 PM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Roku has FNC?


52 posted on 04/09/2014 1:05:30 PM PDT by wardaddy (the real battle is what do we replace America as we knew it with....and will we fight..literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Well,I goofed.

The show was on at noon.Being a night shift worker you’d think I’d know the diff.
I will now DVR tomorrows show at NOON!


53 posted on 04/09/2014 1:13:29 PM PDT by peteyd (A dog may bite you in the ass,but it will never stab you in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson