Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdmathis6

Big puzzle, but whatever it was, they shied off when they saw it. More than one possible set of circumstances could apply; maybe what they were is deliberately unimportant. What is known is that no accusers were left for a guilty sinner who was pardoned and warned from future sin.


64 posted on 04/09/2014 10:35:54 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Jesus, being the fulfillment of the law bodily, did adjudicate the law in this case...but not after the order of Aaron and the levites but after the order of Melchizidek. The priestly order of Aaron would break the bruised reeds and quench the faint embers as was its function but Melchizidek doesn’t ignore the law, but rather allows for restoration under grace for those who are repenting. Jesus was of the priestly order of Melchizidek and could judge with righteous judgment, and not ‘as a man sees’.

As God, Christ had the authority to cast the first stone, and as Revelation points out he will do so as the coming “Faithful and True”! Yet, for the prostitute, he was simply her Redeemer and Restorer!


68 posted on 04/09/2014 3:37:29 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson