He said the Church should have taken a stand back in the 60s. I don’t see why that statement would elicit such an angry response that you feel the need to stalk him and demand that he discuss it with you at length. If you have an opinion on that subject, just state it. You can’t force him to reveal his every thought for your examination. It doesn’t matter which church he was referring to. The statement could apply to any church. If you disagree, just say so. If you think more needs to be said about it, say so yourself. Quit demanding that he say it for you.
Sorry, Anyone bringing the Church negatively, into a discussion that has nothing to do with the Church is going to be questioned.
If you think I was stalking him, you can read it, which you obviously hasn’t.
He doesn’t want it to end with my saying he never answered the question nor stated why he brought the Church into this discussion.
I’m merely stating he hadn’t answered the question. And that was just to defend the Church, the Catholic Church, in case that was what he was talking about but we don’t know, because he has hidden behind hostility, blame, and now a little mob of illogical people.
I don’t care if he never tells what he was talking about I could not care any less.
Just want to point out that his snide remark was unfounded, unnecessary and cowardly, unless he cares to come out from under his bridge and tell the forum what he was talking about and what it had to do with Chick Fil A.
If you call being logical and asking for clarification on denigrating the Church stalking, then good luck in you r little pretend world.