You're making that leap - how is it I can make an assertion about someone, and you contort it into an all encompassing blanket statement....again, you're being intellectually dishonest, and more so, coyly dragging Jim into this, with hopes (no doubt) of getting members banned
Just so were clear - Im done with this thread, but not before stating for the umpteenth time that it is without coincidence you travel thread to thread bashing libertarians...many of whom are more conservative than some you call brother...If anything, Jim should look into your trolling & continual arguing with anyone you come across...your posts are evidence of that.
So you are done with this thread, it looks like all you wanted to do was make personal attacks against an individual freeper.
Why not defend the politics that you disagree with him about?
Why not move to a discussion against his pro-life, pro-marriage, conservative, Christian politics?
As a minister, perhaps you can tell us about why it is wrong to try and change pro-gay marriage laws, and abortion laws and to support conservative politics.
Yup... contortion (and conflation) city. There is never a stationary target. Only the goalposts in ansel12’s mind. This is intellectually dishonest — which means just plain dishonest.
I think you’re wise — let’s call this one to a close here. But if the one who complains disingenuously about being stalked stalks me again elsewhere, I’ll stand up for Christ’s way of doing things.