Posted on 04/07/2014 11:28:45 AM PDT by Nachum
In other words I’d tell Ansel12 and his ilk: We’ll see your fevered revision of the country’s law codes and raise you, like, a couple of constitutional amendments. Pro-life, and marriage. How would that grab you?
read his page - he's his own god ("sheepdog") - humanism on display, and as such you are expecting eyes to see when they've yet to be opened
though I'd be wise to not limit God in this regard....so cast away my FRiend
Maybe you’re right. There just seemed to be a light which wasn’t “on.”
The greatest appreciation for the “hearts and minds” approach is gained by having to strenuously defend it. And here, I did.
God called us to liberty, and of course that does not mean libertine. We can pursue a little blessing, or a lot, and out of a choice of several kinds. Robots with robotic orders we are not.
I can say one thing. After the Obama spendathon, anyone who can slay that money dragon will get a lot of respect. A lot. Fault Paul for being clumsy about some moral issues, but he has this one nailed.
And yes... it does look a lot like “ceremonial God.” Where the virtues are rooted in man. Nope, man messed up virtue real good in the Garden. Regaining it means submitting all over again personally to Christ, a spirit which tells us not only what but when and how. Looks like this sheepdog’s shepherd is not in view.
So you guys believe that Jim Robinson’s, pro-life, pro-marriage efforts and politics, and his conservative site are because he isn’t a good enough Christian?
Do you see his opposition to Rand Paul’s liberalism as being anti-God?
“”Yup. Only he wants to adapt, evolve and advance the homo agenda and open borders more than the older democrats were able to do. Sorry, young Turk Rand. Young comrade Obama beat you to it. Forward!
25 posted on 4/6/2014 6:03:30 PM by Jim Robinson””
“”Yeah, right. If you say so. Must be a new age Christian. Christians I know don’t go for the anything goes b/s. And Christians do believe in defending life, marriage, family, borders, country to the hilt!!
30 posted on 4/6/2014 6:08:27 PM by Jim Robinson””
“”To: RedForemanRules
Look, pal. You don’t like what we stand for here you can post elsewhere. The Internet is a big place. We have a goal here and you seem to be fighting against it. If you’re not with us, you’re against us. You can move along if you don’t like it. I won’t try to stop you. And I won’t try to convince you. That’s not my job and not my goal. You’re a young pup and won’t learn until you’ve been burnt a few times. You can fight for the isolationist, free drugs, free sex, no borders, anything goes liberaltarian viewpoint to your hearts content. Elsewhere! bye
35 posted on 4/6/2014 6:14:49 PM by Jim Robinson “”
You guys can join the discussion on this thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3141542/posts?page=30#30
You are the troll who is posting behind my back on thread after thread, I keep stumbling on your libertarian posts where you are feverishly posting about a freeper without letting him know, that is the behavior of a troll.
You claim to be a Minister, evidently a libertarian Minister, perhaps you should engage some of our pro-life, pro-marriage, 'conservative' Christian Ministers.
If you oppose gay marriage, then why do you oppose our efforts to reverse the gay marriage laws that are in place and to act politically to defeat the gay marriage left/libertarians?
have a smoke and relax sparky
You're making that leap - how is it I can make an assertion about someone, and you contort it into an all encompassing blanket statement....again, you're being intellectually dishonest, and more so, coyly dragging Jim into this, with hopes (no doubt) of getting members banned
Just so were clear - Im done with this thread, but not before stating for the umpteenth time that it is without coincidence you travel thread to thread bashing libertarians...many of whom are more conservative than some you call brother...If anything, Jim should look into your trolling & continual arguing with anyone you come across...your posts are evidence of that.
Being sleazy and dishonest is not typical behavior for a “Minister”, but here you are.
Your dishonest libertarian post 99 was all about the poster that Tulane responded to in post 8, and you have continued to do it in post after post on this thread.
In fact this is your first ping to me on this thread, although your posts have been about me and my pro-life, pro-marriage politics.
You definitely are displaying troll behavior.
How about responding to post 105, you can even visit that thread link and promote your libertarian arguments against FR’s conservative politics, it will be a chance for you to use your skills as a “Minister” to persuade us away from our conservative politics.
So you are done with this thread, it looks like all you wanted to do was make personal attacks against an individual freeper.
Why not defend the politics that you disagree with him about?
Why not move to a discussion against his pro-life, pro-marriage, conservative, Christian politics?
As a minister, perhaps you can tell us about why it is wrong to try and change pro-gay marriage laws, and abortion laws and to support conservative politics.
Yup... contortion (and conflation) city. There is never a stationary target. Only the goalposts in ansel12’s mind. This is intellectually dishonest — which means just plain dishonest.
I think you’re wise — let’s call this one to a close here. But if the one who complains disingenuously about being stalked stalks me again elsewhere, I’ll stand up for Christ’s way of doing things.
I ask you a simple question, the simple question that you treat like a vampire treats the cross.
If you oppose gay marriage and abortion, then why do you oppose our efforts to reverse the gay marriage and abortion laws that are in place, and to act politically to defeat gay marriage, and abortion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.