[All Wallace needed to do was recall the arguments from the previous Hasan shooting. Wallace could probably use the same videos and talking points.]
To wit: the ethnic/racial/social/religious make-up of today’s US military has underscored at least four of these killing sprees that I can think of off the top of my head, two at Fort Hood, two in Afghanistan.
But instead of the possible influence of a military that increasingly operates as a whacko social experiment, we hear that “post-traumatic stress disorder” (PTSD) is what it’s all about.
But PTSD is just a euphemism for battle fatigue, and that was just as common in the WWII era as it is today. Yet how many members of the majority white male US fighting force of long-ago come home shell shocked and go on killing sprees of fellow soldiers?
The point being—
We’ve always had PTSD (no matter what it is called) but only of late have we turned the military into a multi-culti incubator.
Eric Holder asks that America have “a frank conversation on race.”
O.K.
Here you go, Eric.
Why is it that a dominant white male military of the WWII era, just as rife with men suffering battle fatigue or PTSD, did not produce homicidal maniacs? Whereas, today’s military (reflecting all your precious multi-culti imperatives) seems to spit out lunatic killers on a regular basis. Why is that?
Come on, homie. Let’s have a “conversation on race.”
Whacko scocial experiment? It's the elephant in the room...
It's time - time to have that conversation on RACE AND CULTURE... especially 'military culture'...