Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hole_n_one

As you know, when the catcher throws the ball back to the pitcher after a pitch no one in their right mind would say “the ball is in play”. You are confusing the concept of “in play”, to an absurd degree, with the concept of a “live ball”.

As far as name calling goes.... the shoe seems to fit pretty well doesn’t it?


26 posted on 04/05/2014 10:54:07 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganÃœberAlles
As you know, when the catcher throws the ball back to the pitcher after a pitch no one in their right mind would say “the ball is in play”

And when that catcher makes an errant throw back to the pitcher allowing a runner on 3rd to score, I guess you'll continue to say that the ball was never in play.

To limit the "ball in play" condition to simply the act of a hitter hitting the ball is pigeon holing the entire concept..

There are countless scenarios where the ball is in play, runs are scored and outs recorded with a ball not having been hit......

but it always starts with the ball in the pitchers hand.

27 posted on 04/06/2014 12:28:53 AM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson