[DannyTN]

"Name one good thing that either the EPA or FDA do that can not be done by the State’s themselves."

• Control the pollution coming from downwind of our state.
• Or the pollution entering waters that flow through our state from other states.
• Each state could control auto emissions, but it would be far more expensive to the taxpayers than having a consistent standard at the federal level. Californians could probably confirm that.

[CSM]

Yet somehow we were able to survive as a nation for the first nearly 200 years of our country without the Nixonian establishment of the EPA!

Since you are such an ardent supporter of the EPA I don’t understand your continual harping on a need to bring manufacturing back to the US. The EPA has been the single biggest killer of manufacturing jobs in the US, so your support of such an organization is in direct opposition of your parroting of supporting manufacturing.

[CSM]

Hey, you’ve got to break a few eggs to make an omelet!

Report: EPA tested deadly pollutants on humans to push Obama admin’s agenda

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/02/report-epa-tested-deadly-pollutants-on-humans-to-push-obama-admins-agenda/#ixzz2yEJmWF6Q

-snip-

The Environmental Protection Agency has been conducting dangerous experiments on humans over the past few years in order to justify more onerous clean air regulations.

The agency conducted tests on people with health issues and the elderly, exposing them to high levels of potentially lethal pollutants, without disclosing the risks of cancer and death, according to a newly released government report.

These experiments exposed people, including those with asthma and heart problems, to dangerously high levels of toxic pollutants, including diesel fumes, reads a EPA inspector general report obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The EPA also exposed people with health issues to levels of pollutants up to 50 times greater than the agency says is safe for humans.

-end snip-