Skip to comments.
Oil Trains Start Rumbling Into California: Expect a Fierce Political Battle
American Thinker ^
| 04/03/2014
| Chriss Street
Posted on 04/03/2014 8:31:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Phillips 66, formerly a division of energy giant ConocoPhillips, recently filed a project proposal to bring mile-long crude oil trains from Canada and North Dakota to its refinery in California’s San Luis Obispo County. If approved, the project would mean up to 250 trains a year will each haul 2 million gallons of crude oil into California and travel on the same tracks used for Amtrak commuter railtrains in the San Francisco Bay Area. With oil fracking increasing America’s domestic production by 60% in the last three years, political delays in building the Keystone XL Pipeline resulted in California having the only refining capacity available in America. But a with horrible safety record, a political battle will heat up in California over oil trains.America oil production since 2008 is up by about 60% to 2.7 billion barrels a year.In 2013, total U.S. crude oil production grew by 15% to 7.4 million barrels per day as fracking of underground shale formations in the Eagle Ford field of Texas and Bakken in North Dakota allowed both of those states to grow production by 29% for the year. In three years, output grew in North Dakota by 177% and in Texas by 119%.
Railroads have been making fortunes carrying North Dakota crude oil from the Bakken field at an average of $17 a barrel of crude oil to Texas refineries versus an estimated $10 a barrel if the Keystone XL Pipeline had been built. The key beneficiary of this bonanza has been Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Corporation that purchased the Burlington Northern Railway (BNI) in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; energy; environmentalist; oil; rail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Railroads have been making fortunes carrying North Dakota crude oil from the Bakken field at an average of $17 a barrel of crude oil...
No wonder there are so many pipelines.
2
posted on
04/03/2014 8:35:59 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: SeekAndFind
No one rides Amtrack anyway, so whats the problem?
3
posted on
04/03/2014 8:36:29 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
To: SeekAndFind
Idiot leftoids will ride petroleum powered transportation to the rally against petroleum.
5
posted on
04/03/2014 8:45:01 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(The future ain't what it use to be -- Yogi Berra)
To: SeekAndFind
ALL energy producing companies outside of CA should cease supplying them, entirely and immediately. Open the breakers, cut them off. Let them have their ‘pristine’ paradise, without any energy not produced in state. No gasoline, no oil, no electricity. CA environment is just as important as AZ, NV, and any other.
6
posted on
04/03/2014 8:46:54 AM PDT
by
RoadGumby
(This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
To: SeekAndFind
ALL energy producing companies outside of CA should cease supplying them, entirely and immediately. Open the breakers, cut them off. Let them have their ‘pristine’ paradise, without any energy not produced in state. No gasoline, no oil, no electricity. CA environment is just as important as AZ, NV, and any other.
7
posted on
04/03/2014 8:47:38 AM PDT
by
RoadGumby
(This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
To: SeekAndFind
The key beneficiary of this bonanza has been Warren Buffets Berkshire Hathaway Corporation that purchased the Burlington Northern Railway (BNI) in 2009. Now we know why Democrats oppose Keystone.
8
posted on
04/03/2014 8:51:22 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: SeekAndFind
With oil fracking increasing Americas domestic production by 60% in the last three yearsNow, there's a truly astonishing stat! And entirely the work of private enterprise, indeed intentionally hampered by government regulation.
Incentivized by the massive potential profits.
Even greater profits are out there for someone who develops a truly clean way to burn coal. Would be quite surprised if considerable resources aren't being devoted to finding one.
To: SeekAndFind
If I were king, I would prohibit all oil imports to California until they emptied the oil reserves off their own coasts.
10
posted on
04/03/2014 8:54:25 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(The Chicago Way: Kill the Constitution, one step at a time.)
To: skeeter
To: SeekAndFind
Worth noting:
Before the "refinery row" complex between Salt Lake City and Ogden was built, all Utah-produced oil was shipped by the trainload to San Francisco Bay area refineries for processing.
12
posted on
04/03/2014 8:55:36 AM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Iron Munro
How long till one of these enviro whackos sabotages a train to create a spill? Then the media will jump in and say “oh no! enviromental disaster!
13
posted on
04/03/2014 8:57:37 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
To: SeekAndFind
Sooner or later one of these trains is going to come rolling downhill from the Sierras without a full set of brakes. That will be interesting to see.
14
posted on
04/03/2014 8:59:11 AM PDT
by
glorgau
To: skeeter
“No one rides Amtrack anyway”
Who can afford it? It’s rediculously expensive.
15
posted on
04/03/2014 9:00:09 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
To: RoadGumby
16
posted on
04/03/2014 9:05:53 AM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: SeekAndFind
But a with horrible safety record, a political battle will heat up in California over oil trains.I stopped reading after this.
"horrible" is activist hyperbole.
Then only show a photo of a disaster. Nice.
Let's have a discussion about public transportation, starting with derailment photos.
These trains would not cross the Sierras, but come through Oregon, past Lake Shasta. They had a chemical train derailment on this route.
But short of a pipeline, and 38 million people that need to travel, what are the alternatives?
17
posted on
04/03/2014 9:08:32 AM PDT
by
cicero2k
To: SeekAndFind
I've seen an uptick in the number of carloads of crude that pas through the rail yard that I work at, and I don't see that going away anytime soon. There's more refineries on the west coast than people think, and no pipelines headed that way. And BTW, I don't play on buffet's toy train set, and consider him to be competition to be crushed.
18
posted on
04/03/2014 9:08:34 AM PDT
by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
To: SeekAndFind
We get one of the trains daily here in Anacortes WA. The environuts are too worried about the coal trains to notice..
19
posted on
04/03/2014 9:12:39 AM PDT
by
datura
(We have a 2 party system. Conservatives vs Uniparty)
To: Pecos
If I were king, I would prohibit all oil imports to California until they emptied the oil reserves off their own coasts.”
And I would strongly support you. I also think other states should quit selling them electricity. They can use their wind farms and solar to meet their needs. I would, however, allow an exemption to all California Freepers.
20
posted on
04/03/2014 9:16:54 AM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson