Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: basil

“The base is still a “Gun Free Zone”—AKA “Killing fields”

A “gun-free” Army post. I want to say it’s shamelful, but after two shooting incidents it’s more like (Benghazi) criminal negligence.
Obama’s “my security team” `hope and change’, 2014! Watch closely: they will do nothing to improve Ft. Hood security after this second shooting as well.
Shameful and culpable.


54 posted on 04/02/2014 6:03:00 PM PDT by tumblindice (Are all Democrats inveterate, habitual liars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice

Military personnel now guard the gates. 1 pistol(9mm) and MAYBE a rifle in the gatehouse. Rifle would not be loaded if SOP has not changed. They do not search cars; it would be impossible to do it and do it properly without lines that stretched for miles all day. It would not be hard to take a weapon on post if you want to...obviously. When they were present civilian guards carried 9mm; that is why Hassan is still alive.
I have CCW for Texas, but I can’t carry on post. One wonders why? The CG can’t guarantee my safety, the MP’s aren’t everywhere. But I just can’t protect myself. That is why I go to Ft. Hood about once every few months.
Retired here and try to play by the rules. But sometimes I wonder.....?


57 posted on 04/02/2014 6:19:05 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson