I have thought for some time that we have been witnessing strategic voter fraud in our presidential elections. The RICO democrats know in advance which states are going to be swing states. They also know which counties and precincts in those states are swing entities. While normally a strong proponent of Occam’s razor and skeptical of conspiracy theories; an argument can be made that massive fraud is not necessary to tip a presidential election...just enough fraud in the right places to do the job. This is basically an updated version of the 1960 Chicago playbook. An argument can also be made that the high stakes in a presidential election justify the risk associated with the fraud. It also helps that the Democrats, being the government party, have been so successful in placing their functionaries throughout the entire apparatus.
I think you are absolutely right. I've thought the same thing, here in Ohio.
It can be "double voting", "dead voting", "mentally/medically incompetent voting", "illegal voting"...choose your fraud!
Saying "it's not widespread" doesn't mean it's not just enough. More like saying, "look at this iceberg tip - nothing else provable to see here, you can't disenfranchise these voters"...
They want us to believe that not a single illiterate, drunken crackhead being paid for his vote did not accidentally vote incorrectly.