Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Not necessarily. VPs don’t have a lock on the presidency. A VP candidate is there to help get the nominee elected President. That is the major criteria for a VP nominee. If Paul helps bring in indepedents and get Cruz elected I am fine with it. He would never be elected President so I am not worried about it. Even if he did get elected somehow he would be better than a Hillary or an Obama


63 posted on 04/01/2014 12:58:40 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

Choosing a veep is choosing a president, that is the accurate and proper assumption, does it hold true in every case? no, but it is the proper assumption, if you want to keep someone out of the presidency, you would not want to make them vice president.

On the other hand, if you have a favorite who couldn’t quite snag the nomination first time around, there is no better place that you would want him, than being vice president.


67 posted on 04/01/2014 1:39:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson