To: marktwain
Yeah, the story notes that, but the family wants to force the armed citizen to rack up thousands of dollars in legal fees so that their armed robber thug can get their "justice."
Never mind the fact that they DID get their justice.
9 posted on
03/31/2014 6:38:58 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Timber Rattler
If you watch the video until the end, it’s states the hero is protected from being sued by the castle doctrine.
good guys win, open and shut.
17 posted on
03/31/2014 6:43:18 AM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied .. the economy died.)
To: Timber Rattler
There was another recent case where a citizen shot and killed a thug who had a handgun trained on a clerk.
The criminal's family said, I'm not kidding, that since the citizen had a chance to run away rather than defend the clerk that he should have just run away - and that he shouldn't have said anything about it to anyone.
They specifically said he should have not called police or anything because it "wasn't any of his business."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson