Not true. They could have led.
These articles blaming conservatives for our sorry state are flying thick and fast. And each one makes me despise the GOPe more.
Correct. National Review is just another RINO loving GOPe loving rag.
The evil RINOs are once again beginning the campaign to brainwash Conservatives into believing that ANY Republican is better having a RAT in office. I beg to differ.
A very simple example will prove the disgusting RINO lovers at NR wrong. Take the anti-Tea Party, very anti-Conservative fraud know as Boehner. In the fall elections there is an extremely high probability of the Republicans retaining the House.
If Boehner is reelected his #1 priority will be the destruction of the Tea Party and illegal immigration Amnesty. Given his seat is 100.00% safe, if by some miracle Conservatives and other Americans in his district would vote for his unknown RAT opponent it would be a great victory for Conservatives.
By defeating Boehner with a RAT, at least there is a 100% certainty he will be gone from the House. The unknown RAT will likely be flushed in two years.
Washington and others railed again political parties. I am sick and tired of Rove, the idiots at the NR and others saying that "any" R is better than any RAT.
Somehow these hard-core Statist RINOs must be destroyed politically.
If one contemplates only the example of Boehner losing to a RAT one can see in the big scheme that it would be a good thing. We need new blood in Washington, we need the RINO political class destroyed politically.
For those who think it's nut's for Boehner to lose to a RAT, please bookmark this thread. Then come back around June of 2015 and let's reflect on the damage done by Boehner to our Republic from this day to then.