Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
A lot of people would say this is exactly why NATO should not have been expanded eastward. We find ourselves on the hook defending tiny countries no one cares about. The original NATO made sense. The new one doesn’t.

If the original NATO made sense then an expanded NATO makes sense.

And if there is any country worth defending in the expanded NATO it's Estonia.

Peace thru strength (dare I say).

56 posted on 03/27/2014 5:35:18 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

And how do you propose we do it?

We’re cutting our military to the bone and there is no political constituency in the EU for higher defense spending.

NATO is a sad joke under the current circumstances. And we’d be fighting a war on terrain advantageous to the Russians.


58 posted on 03/27/2014 5:39:32 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign
"If the original NATO made sense then an expanded NATO makes sense"

I'd like to hear a supporting argument for that contention.

the idea that the USA has an interest in defending Bulgaria from anyone, at any time is ludicrous to me.

Romania?

And, would you expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia...and would their defense with US Forces make sense?

To "make sense" there would have to be a real US strategic interest.

67 posted on 03/27/2014 6:07:26 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson