Skip to comments.
Paul Ryan: Immigration a question of 'when'
Pollutico ^
| March 26, 2014 10:44 AM EDT
| Seung Min Kim
Posted on 03/26/2014 2:13:40 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Ryan is getting payola from somewhere.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Chamber of Commerce and Americans for Prosperity. You need big bucks from your corporate paymasters if you want to run for the WH.
2
posted on
03/26/2014 2:15:06 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Somebody please tell me why some conservatives got excited when he was named Romney’s running mate?
3
posted on
03/26/2014 2:15:53 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Can anyone who has followed Paul Ryan’s career tell me if he has ALWAYS been a muscle-head scumbag?
4
posted on
03/26/2014 2:17:03 PM PDT
by
alstewartfan
(Two broken Tigers on fire in the night Flicker their souls to the wind. From RTMoscow by Al Stewart)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s funny. In the 70s they told us there was a population explosion and to stop having babies.
So, instead, now...why not encourage American’s to have families?
5
posted on
03/26/2014 2:17:55 PM PDT
by
Beowulf9
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How much under the table cash has Big Business and the Chamber
paid Ryan to be their pimp?
6
posted on
03/26/2014 2:18:19 PM PDT
by
tennmountainman
(Just Say No To Obamacare)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Paul Ryan: Immigration a question of 'when'Assuming for the sake of argument that that is true, when the National Socialists have the Senate and White Hut is the WRONG time. Nothing that would get past them would be worth passing, and there's good likelihood the GOP will have the Senate or very nearly so after January. Why piss of the base now by (a) opening the issue at all when you're at least in a position to block it and (b) doing it under circumstances that guarantee bad legislation?
7
posted on
03/26/2014 2:18:23 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
[Article, quoting Ryan]
.... reform is inevitable and necessary to boost growth in the United States. Pure Chamber of Commerce B.S.
Break wages! Chittagong scales now!!!
"What this country needs is a good five-cent human being."
To: fwdude
I have heard for years about the “broken” immigration laws by politicians of all stripes. Can someone kindly tell me what part of the immigration law is broken, other than the enforcement.
Enforce what we have, and there will be nothing broken.
Gwjack
9
posted on
03/26/2014 2:19:20 PM PDT
by
gwjack
(May God give America His richest blessings.)
To: Still Thinking
Ryan is right. Just getting the right bill is the question.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ryan is more dangerous to our nation than Putin. Putin is not trying to destroy us, Ryan now is.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If you don't support Ryan's immigration reform efforts, it is the same as voting for Nancy Pelosie for Speaker of the House.
</s>
12
posted on
03/26/2014 2:21:37 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: Still Thinking
Why piss of the base now by (a) opening the issue at all when you're at least in a position to block it and (b) doing it under circumstances that guarantee bad legislation? Because their window of opportunity to walk this abortion through Congress past the People is closing, as the Tea Party begins to realize its power and advance our own agenda -- which doesn't include busting everybody back to 40 cents/hour in a world of Rodeo Drive prices.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Go to hell, Paul. You have shamed yourself.
14
posted on
03/26/2014 2:21:43 PM PDT
by
dforest
To: itsahoot
You almost got me -- I almost didn't see the </sarc> tag.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I want Immigration Reform too! I want our borders secured and our current laws enforced as written, not the way the traitors in the White House, Justice Department and Congress interpret them. Until that happens all of these elected traitors need to shut the hell up. In a just world there would have been more than a few trials for treason taking place.
16
posted on
03/26/2014 2:22:59 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: gwjack
I have been asking that question for years....to no avail, I might add. Regardless, the fix is in.
17
posted on
03/26/2014 2:23:17 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Can we deal with the folks that are here in a way that is reasonable, that does not violate the rights of folks who have done things legally, [and] can we strictly adhere to the rule of law? Yes, we can! Encourage self-deportation. Follow up with forced deportation.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
19
posted on
03/26/2014 2:24:16 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: dforest
Go to hell, Paul. You have shamed yourself. Dittos.
20
posted on
03/26/2014 2:24:52 PM PDT
by
jimt
(Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson