Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
so far it hasn’t had any worse impact than alcohol

And we sure want more people out there driving DUI.

5 posted on 03/26/2014 10:04:19 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grobdriver
when and if they ever start testing "drunk" drivers for other drugs, I think we'll all be shocked at how many also have weed and other drugs in their system...

so which drug do you pin the intoxication and incompetance on?....alcohol always gets the wrap because its politically correct to attack alcohol while other stuff like weed and cocaine just get that little wink wink...afterall, all the beautiful people use the coke.....

12 posted on 03/26/2014 10:11:44 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: grobdriver
And we sure want more people out there driving DUI.

So, you must believe in gun control laws for EVERYONE, just because one person kills a group of kids, right?

My point: just because some people use and abuse alcohol and THEN go out and break laws, does not mean that we should ban alcohol; you ban the bad behavior (i.e., DUI laws, etc...). In America, we should punish people for doing a bad thing (i.e., DUI, murder, etc...). We should NOT punish people because someone else did something stupid, or even because they might, possibly, could have the opportunity to do a bad thing.
14 posted on 03/26/2014 10:13:19 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: grobdriver

They want exemption from DUI laws. Pot stays in their bloodstream but is “inactive”, don’t you know? Besides stoners only “drive too slow” they claim.

Never mind that the deadly accidents aren’t from 0.08 drunk drivers (being pushed downward to 0.03 and it’s 0.01 in Sweden).

Since the standard for alcohol use is headed towards “any measurable amount in your blood”, why not go ahead and keep pot at that threshold? They were fine with demonizing alcohol and tobacco.


26 posted on 03/26/2014 10:27:58 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: grobdriver

And we sure want more people out there driving DUI.


States that liberalize pot laws have a proven DECREASE in traffic fatalities.

It’s either because some are substituting pot for alcohol (and are better drivers stoned than drunk) or because pot smokers tend to do it at home, while drinkers are more likely to be at bars and restaurants.

For me, I’d prefer a few more annoying stoners and give up the police state war on drugs that infringes liberties of everyone.


107 posted on 03/26/2014 12:42:19 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson