I count the refusal to discuss, and try to prevent anyone else from discussing the Constitutional basis of federal drug legislation as wanton ignorance.
When I first posted to your post 16, I tried engaging you on your list of liberal positions and the feds, it set you off on a wild trip of avoidance and name calling and cussing and calling the mods.
I showed you that in post 133.
To: tacticalogic
To: gdani
*””But when it’s something they are against - marijuana, assisted suicide, gay marriage, etc - they become the Fed Govt’s biggest cheerleaders.””*
If it needs to be under federal authority then we need to get an amendment. If they think we can abuse the Commerce Clause without unintended consequences they’re pissing into the wind.
16 posted on 3/26/2014 10:15:02 AM by tacticalogic
To: tacticalogic
Remember that abortion and gay marriage in the military and for federal employees, and in immigration, and homosexuals in the military, are all federal.
We need to select candidates who are against liberalism at all levels, from city hall to the state, to the Senate and Presidency, whether negotiating with a County union, or state legislation on gay marriage or abortion, or marriage recognition and abortion in the military, and not let them exist as leaders who support the left’s causes, by pretending that they are forced to support the left’s agenda.
27 posted on 3/26/2014 10:29:15 AM by ansel12
133 posted on 3/26/2014 3:10:06 PM by ansel12
You seem to oppose the “they” who oppose liberalism like gay marriage, according to post 16.
Your politics are pretty obvious and they are purely liberal, not something that you are forced to accept from the left, by the force of the constitution.