Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Victor

Since the service ceiling of the 777 is ~42,000ft I would assume they intended the shell to be able to handle a normal cabin pressure at that altitude.


Because the pressure at 42k is about 15% that at sea level, it’s only about 15% more stress on the plane to remain pressurized in a vacuum. Which is nothing compared to safety margins. (Yes, I know that it’s not 1 ATM inside at 24k feet, but the principle still applies).


55 posted on 03/26/2014 8:50:02 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Atlas Sneezed
Because the pressure at 42k is about 15% that at sea level, it’s only about 15% more stress on the plane to remain pressurized in a vacuum. Which is nothing compared to safety margins. (Yes, I know that it’s not 1 ATM inside at 24k feet, but the principle still applies).

They're probably using a factor of safety of 1.1 on the pressure shell. That would be typical for the aerospace industry with load conditions well established. But your point is well taken that if the aircraft could maintain lift, the pressure shell will likely hold.

65 posted on 03/26/2014 10:26:41 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson