[SpaceBar]

The government lawyer is correct. Corporations have no religious freedom, because they are creations of the government - not God.

Yet in the same breath, the same sleazebag hired-gun lawyer will argue the right of corporations to give millions to democratic candidates because their recognition as corpus (of the body, and equivalent to a living being), they have freedom of speech. Can't have it both ways.

[Talisker]

Can't have it both ways.

Can indeed have it both ways - because corporations are given privileges that are based SOLELY on the needs of the State. If those privileges imitate rights, fine. If they don't - fine too. But the consistancy of corporate rulings has nothing to do with their comparison to rights - only to State needs. So you're making a false comparison.