LMAO. Citing an FDA fact sheet? And it doesn’t even address the point (it is about second-hand smoke)? I was talking about nicotine, not smoke. And I was talking about the supposed addictiveness, not issues like lung cancer, which clearly has nothing to do with nicotine.
How about addressing the points I made? Why do never-smokers display no symptoms of addiction, even when given nicotine over a period of months? What actual evidence is there that nicotine, by itself, is addictive? The answers, for those playing at home, are because nicotine is not really addictive in any appreciable way, and none, respectively.