Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BEWARE: No-Knock SWAT Attacks
Townhall.com ^ | March 24, 2014 | Katie Kieffer

Posted on 03/24/2014 7:43:21 AM PDT by Kaslin

Gun owners beware. Squirt gun owners, that includes you. If a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team SUSPECTS you of crime, you may receive a late-night visit from an armed SWAT team.

That’s right, an armed and militant SWAT team could trot right through your front door as you slumber this summer. No-knock warrants are increasingly used by military-style police units, like SWAT teams for drug raids. Unfortunately, SWAT teams can obtain these warrants too easily from judges and consequently do not always perform sufficient due diligence. As a result, tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding American citizens are surprised every year by a no-knock visit when the SWAT team gets it wrong.

While we do not know the exact number of wrongful No-Knock SWAT invasions, a 2006 article by Cato Institute policy analyst put the number at 40,000 a year! We must rally together and use our freedom of speech to protest such an atrocity.

Think about it: When a SWAT team invades the wrong home in the middle of the night, as happened in the case of Tracy Ingle in 2008, the results can be bloody. SWAT team members barreled through Ingle’s main door and bedroom window under the cover of darkness. Understandably, Ingle thought he was being robbed and attempted to exercise his natural right to self-defense by reaching for what The New American describes as “a non-working gun.”

Completely disregarding Ingle’s natural and constitutional rights to self-defense (2nd Amendment); private property (4th Amendment) and right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty (4th, 5th and 6th Amendments)—the SWAT team fired at Ingle over nine times—pummeling his chest, calf, arm and hip and shattering his leg bone.

It wasn’t until afterward that the SWAT team thought to verify Ingle’s identity by asking him if he was the criminal they were looking for named “Michael.” When they realized Ingle was not “Michael” but “Terry,” they rushed him to the hospital.

We certainly have many good and conscientious law enforcement officers in the United States. However, it is completely unjust and unethical for a team of law enforcement officers to storm into our homes and blast bullet holes through any moving shadow. Using this irresponsible method of “law enforcement,” a SWAT team could also accidently kill many innocent bystanders such as children, spouses or even pets who happen to live at the same house as the suspected criminal.

58 percent of Americans favor legalizing marijuana, according to an October 2013 Gallup report. The number of Americans who favor legalization has risen steadily as more Americans witness the failure of the “War on Drugs.” The combination of violent Mexican drug lords and unethical American drug cops (think Eric Holder) has been a recipe for disaster. Besides performing better due diligence, there’s another solution to preventing wrongful No-Knock SWAT invasions. If we were to legalize drugs, we would see a decrease in the narcotic crime rate. Legitimate business owners would eventually put the drug cartels out of business by reducing their profit margins.

How many more “Fasts and Furious” scandals are we willing to endure where we lose the lives of U.S. Border Patrol agents like Nicolas Ivie and Brian Terry? How many more chronically ill patients must be deprived of natural and effective treatment for their cancer or multiple sclerosis? How many more Terry Ingles need to wake up in the middle of the night to a spray of SWAT bullets? How many more Americans need to endure needless pain and bloodshed before we recognize the constitutional right of states to legalize drugs? One more American is one too many.

Speak up and tell your elected representatives to defend your 2nd, 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights. Say no to No-Knock SWAT Team invasions.

Gun owners beware. Squirt gun owners, that includes you. If a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team SUSPECTS you of crime, you may receive a late-night visit from an armed SWAT team.

That’s right, an armed and militant SWAT team could trot right through your front door as you slumber this summer. No-knock warrants are increasingly used by military-style police units, like SWAT teams for drug raids. Unfortunately, SWAT teams can obtain these warrants too easily from judges and consequently do not always perform sufficient due diligence. As a result, tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding American citizens are surprised every year by a no-knock visit when the SWAT team gets it wrong.

While we do not know the exact number of wrongful No-Knock SWAT invasions, a 2006 article by Cato Institute policy analyst put the number at 40,000 a year! We must rally together and use our freedom of speech to protest such an atrocity.

Think about it: When a SWAT team invades the wrong home in the middle of the night, as happened in the case of Tracy Ingle in 2008, the results can be bloody. SWAT team members barreled through Ingle’s main door and bedroom window under the cover of darkness. Understandably, Ingle thought he was being robbed and attempted to exercise his natural right to self-defense by reaching for what The New American describes as “a non-working gun.”

Completely disregarding Ingle’s natural and constitutional rights to self-defense (2nd Amendment); private property (4th Amendment) and right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty (4th, 5th and 6th Amendments)—the SWAT team fired at Ingle over nine times—pummeling his chest, calf, arm and hip and shattering his leg bone.

It wasn’t until afterward that the SWAT team thought to verify Ingle’s identity by asking him if he was the criminal they were looking for named “Michael.” When they realized Ingle was not “Michael” but “Terry,” they rushed him to the hospital.

We certainly have many good and conscientious law enforcement officers in the United States. However, it is completely unjust and unethical for a team of law enforcement officers to storm into our homes and blast bullet holes through any moving shadow. Using this irresponsible method of “law enforcement,” a SWAT team could also accidently kill many innocent bystanders such as children, spouses or even pets who happen to live at the same house as the suspected criminal.

58 percent of Americans favor legalizing marijuana, according to an October 2013 Gallup report. The number of Americans who favor legalization has risen steadily as more Americans witness the failure of the “War on Drugs.” The combination of violent Mexican drug lords and unethical American drug cops (think Eric Holder) has been a recipe for disaster. Besides performing better due diligence, there’s another solution to preventing wrongful No-Knock SWAT invasions. If we were to legalize drugs, we would see a decrease in the narcotic crime rate. Legitimate business owners would eventually put the drug cartels out of business by reducing their profit margins.

How many more “Fasts and Furious” scandals are we willing to endure where we lose the lives of U.S. Border Patrol agents like Nicolas Ivie and Brian Terry? How many more chronically ill patients must be deprived of natural and effective treatment for their cancer or multiple sclerosis? How many more Terry Ingles need to wake up in the middle of the night to a spray of SWAT bullets? How many more Americans need to endure needless pain and bloodshed before we recognize the constitutional right of states to legalize drugs? One more American is one too many.

Speak up and tell your elected representatives to defend your 2nd, 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights. Say no to No-Knock SWAT Team invasions.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; barf; donutwatch; druggierant; guns; leosoutofcontrol; paultards; pothead; secondamendment; swat; swatteam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: Kaslin
"a 2006 article by Cato Institute policy analyst put the number at 40,000 a year"

Surprised we don't hear more about this, if this number is even close to being accurate. That'd be over 100 mistaken identity raids every 24 hour period, right?

41 posted on 03/24/2014 9:05:49 AM PDT by gettinolder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
Do a picture search on US SWAT teams which I just did. It depends on the type SWAT teams. Many do exactly like that

US SWAT teams

42 posted on 03/24/2014 9:05:50 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Thanks. My wife and I are still a car wreck, though. The anxiety attacks are a bitch.


43 posted on 03/24/2014 9:06:41 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

I think it’s the courts. I have found no provision in Texas or Federal law for a “no-knock” warrant.


44 posted on 03/24/2014 9:10:11 AM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
I would be very surprised if that picture is from America. Very.

At the very least it is from an English speaking country.

45 posted on 03/24/2014 9:11:04 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Author would have done better to just address the no knock raids rather than try to tie it to legalization of pot.

That should be brought to the attention of this column's author...

46 posted on 03/24/2014 9:11:17 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Good luck explaining a victimless crime to some people around here. They simply don’t get it and would rather someone else make the decision for them. Then they put up a straw man and cry lime the liberals they truly are.


47 posted on 03/24/2014 9:11:54 AM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ka-nock Kanock!!!

Ve are vit your local Gestapo.. You have notzing to fear..

if you cooperate.

If Not.. you vill be dealt with.


48 posted on 03/24/2014 9:12:50 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All

That picture sure does look like a bunch of prancing Kansas City Fa#$%ts to me...

Ala Slim Pickens from “Blazing Saddles” fame...

(you gotta watch the show to get the humor)


49 posted on 03/24/2014 9:14:47 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
The overwhelming majority are done at a state level. A state could ban “no-knock” raids and legally the Fed would not be able to circumvent that law. Not that it would probably stop them.
50 posted on 03/24/2014 9:14:58 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The image of SWAT shown in article is listed by Google Images as being taken in Iraq

Members of Iraq's Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) march during a ceremony marking Police Day at the police academy in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014. (Karim Kadim, Associated Press)

51 posted on 03/24/2014 9:15:30 AM PDT by gettinolder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I think I would rather play the peeeanoooooo than Marrrrch up and down the squayahhhhh!!!


52 posted on 03/24/2014 9:16:44 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That is the gayest little prance I’ve ever seen.


53 posted on 03/24/2014 9:18:04 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

You’ll see some of that in Matt Bracken’s first trilogy of novels...


54 posted on 03/24/2014 9:18:12 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

And every one of them is worth a read.


55 posted on 03/24/2014 9:19:30 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Zippo44

Number 3 should be easy to do. Numbers 1 and 3 would be difficult, but I’m for it.


56 posted on 03/24/2014 9:21:36 AM PDT by Rodd OB (24 year Simi Valleyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

“Who has the legislative power to put an end to this? Local? State? Federal?”

Say hello Mr. SWAT member to Mr. .30-06 Springfield and his brother .308 Winchester. Lights out and Big Dirt Nap.


57 posted on 03/24/2014 9:22:14 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
That is the gayest little prance I’ve ever seen.

S.W.A.T. Dancercise? Looks like they're rehearshing their can-can number for the agency follies.

58 posted on 03/24/2014 9:22:56 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Anyone know the statistics on the number of children who have been killed, maimed or wounded as a result of No-Knock police invasions?


59 posted on 03/24/2014 9:32:36 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good luck. This the new normal.

I predict that at some point it will become so prevalent that people will start to retaliate. A few of these thugs get their houses burned to the ground in the middle of the night or get one through the forehead while driving to the donut shop; a .50 cal through the side of the SWAT van etc. etc. Its bound to start happening. I’m suprised it hasn’t already.


60 posted on 03/24/2014 9:38:25 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson