Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USAF80

“Take away the monetary rewards from the state and you would see a lot less absent fathers.”


We would see far less absent fathers if they would just be accountable for what they help to create. The state has nothing to do with it...except having to take the financial heat and chase deadbeat parents around to “make” them pay for their own children.

There are also many single mothers who do not pursue support, either...for one reason or another.


145 posted on 03/23/2014 7:24:04 PM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: ourworldawry

The states have everything to do with it. Every dollar of support is matched by the Feds so it behooves the states to destitute the fathers. I think both parties should be financially responsible for the children not just the fathers.

If it was “for the kids” as they say then whoever makes the most money should get the children. Custody should be a simple case of both parties presenting proof of income and whoever makes the most gets the kids.


146 posted on 03/23/2014 7:49:13 PM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson