The problem with idiots and liberals (but I repeat myself) is that they think “trickle down” means that government GIVES money to the rich and they are supposed to give it to the poor.
I heard idiot Larry King say to a libtard that the problem with ‘trickle down economics’ was that “they didn’t trickle”- meaning those evil greedy rich kept all that money
What it means is that if the rich enterpreaneurs KEPT more of their money (not taxed away) they would be able to provide jobs which would the boost the economy.
“What it means is that if the rich enterpreaneurs KEPT more of their money (not taxed away) they would be able to provide jobs which would the boost the economy”
The rich are not and should not be o obliged to provide jobs or boost the economy.
It just so happens that the act of preserving and growing wealth naturally generates employment and circulates money, which boasts the economy.
My point is that even if the rich burn their money, thus not create jobs and boost the economy, it is their right to do so.