Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C210N
Presuming a normal airliner at normal altitude of 30,000+ feet, and one well below trying to follow it, there is an immediate problem. The lower a/c will have a much lower airspeed and be MUCH less fuel efficient

It wouldn't be that far below. The closer the better -- I'm thinking below and behind, 100-200 feet.

These guys weren't likely trained for it, but C-5's fly close formation for 25 minutes or more at a time while refueling from a tanker, with only a few feet separation. 100 feet is much easier.

109 posted on 03/17/2014 3:58:03 PM PDT by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: zipper

100 to 200 feet at night? barely less than a wingspan?

dicey enough during the day.

well, it’s a theory!


113 posted on 03/17/2014 4:06:00 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson