Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robert14
-- Not releasing the data should result in a lawsuit from the families especially if we find out that anyone survived but died of exposure because the data was not released. --

I'm sure Boeing would provide all the information it had (if it had any that was flight-specific, not saying for sure it did), pronto. Not that the information would be delivered publicly, just that any entity involved in the loss would get the information, especially the airline and the national authorities.

Boeing is always in line for a lawsuit on a crash event, even if the primary cause is traced back to pilot error. "Could have designed the aircraft to make this error less likely," etc.

189 posted on 03/16/2014 11:09:01 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Summarizing with latest facts: 1. Both the ACARS and AHM use the same Iridium transponder 2. Since the airline did not subscribe to AHM either no aircraft system data was ever sent or if it was Boeing archieved it 3) the Iridium transponder on the 777 pings the Iridium satellite system once per hour no matter what the ACARS or AHM are doing, and 4. Since the final ACARS report was never recieved either the gear never came down or the transponder was in an Iridium hole when the transition was made. How is that?


192 posted on 03/16/2014 11:21:10 AM PDT by robert14 (cng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson