Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Logistically and strategically, it would have been simpler to obtain a surplus airliner, move it to a remote location near the target. Refurbish it, load it with explosives, then fly it at the target. They would have the advantage of time and would not have to penetrate airport and airline security. Such an operation would also show that airport security is immaterial to protecting the public.

But then what do I know.


21 posted on 03/14/2014 5:50:06 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: ops33

Taking it a step further...why even use a jetliner?

If somebody wanted to deliver a nuke or even a lot of explosives, wouldn’t an ordinary run of the mill private airplane do the trick? They could just steal one from the local air strip hangar and skip the whole hijacking a jetliner step.


30 posted on 03/14/2014 6:31:49 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson