[wtd]

This FoxVideo report, "Aviation expert on why Flight 370 may have been diverted" mentions @1:45 there are :

"five different ways [for pilots] to report back to home base or somewhere, wouldn't they figure out a way to get some message out?"

To which this aviation expert responds:

"Every pilot is trained to first fly the airplane and then communicate. So, if they are not doing that and the airplane is airborne, they're disabled"

I beg to differ here, specifically in this instance because of the reports of multiple security breaches which include:

• 5 passengers checking in but not boarding, only to have this point later denied,
• questions about Faruq Abdul Hamid, the 27 year old co-pilot who entertained young pretty passengers and crew members in the cockpit,
• The multiple passengers traveling with stolen passports

  'stolen passports' being of particular interest given

• Uighurs were deported to China from Malaysia in 2011 and 2012 for carrying false passports.
• “Data from Interpol show there were 39 million lost or stolen passports as at the end of last year.”
• “Interpol says no country checked its database for information about stolen passports that were used to board the Malaysia Airlines flight..."
• via Calcutta News: Travel by passengers with stolen identities can be prevented . . .but apparently WASN’T

  . . .etc.

  In my opinion, another possible scenario to consider, beyond the suggested possibility of a disabled flight crew, especially given the aggregious, albeit partial list of security breaches above,

• consider a complicit flight crew

[no-to-illegals]

consider a complicit flight crew

considering 24 hours.