I take it the author doesn't like Federalism or the Tenth Amendment. IMO, Kelo was correctly decided, regardless of the outrage perpetrated by the City of New London. Be careful what you wish for if you want the Feds securing your rights against the States.
I'm disagreeing that Kelo was decided correctly.
The pro-judges saying effectively saying that if the "victims" don't like it, they could vote the the perpetrating rascals out.
Curious as to why you believe Kelo was correctly decided.