Rand Paul’s Crimea Flip Flops Disqualify Him For the Presidency

Redstate ^ | March 12th, 2014 at 02:45 PM | streiff

[House Atreides]

I love Ted....plan on supporting him all that I can.

I just note that Rand is still more conservative than anyone the GOPe has run since 1984
*******************************************************************

That’s true about Rand Paul. It’s not enough for me though in today’s environment—we’re nearing the point of no return, and Amnesty is a deal breaker for me.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Thanks SoCon, what a flippin disaster!

Is it really that difficult to choose your position and stick to it?! I wasn’t a huge fan, now I’m not even a tepid fan.

Stand on principle guys, this is NOT complicated!!

[celmak]

"I do not know if Rand is a ‘moral conservative’ (whatever that has come to mean)"

It means he's willing to give up on the social issues.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3133268/posts

Ted Cruz will not have any of that.

[Nifster]

So if Ted Cruz is not the nominee but Rand Paul is does that mean you will sit on your hands and stay home?

[celmak]

"So if Ted Cruz is not the nominee but Rand Paul is does that mean you will sit on your hands and stay home?"

Nope, I'll hold my nose as I did with Rawdeal and McInsane.

[Nifster]

Ok got it.

I am a big fan of Ted. I am doing all I can to make sure he is the nominee. Rand bothers me a lot less than McShamey or Mittens

[SunkenCiv]

Note: this topic was posted 3/13/2014. Thanks SoConPubbie.

[grania]

Rand Paul had a chance to win the war-weary vote by espousing a foreign policy of non-involvement when US interests are not at stake. It does seem he just messed that up.