Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

You have just come up with the Energizer Bunny that will dwarf the energy costs of building it, MAYBE. I don’t know how big this thing is... and also how are they calculating density, like based on before-and-after masses of the apparatus? Or based on gross mass?

Just be sure nobody’s pulling a slick one on you. It would be so tempting, especially if the technology is tied to a person and not open!


74 posted on 03/13/2014 12:54:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I don’t know how big this thing is... and also how are they calculating density, like based on before-and-after masses of the apparatus? Or based on gross mass?
***The guys who calculated it are all eminent physics professors in Europe, so I’m certain they know which way to calculate it is the best. Far better than how I would do it, although it would have made sense for someone like me to come alongside and simply say, “we should just go and rent our own power source”. That kinda thing. A bit pedestrian, but in the end, saves everyone a bunch of headache.

Just be sure nobody’s pulling a slick one on you. It would be so tempting, especially if the technology is tied to a person and not open!
***Well, at this point I would say confidently that the technology is open. There is the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, which recently found GAMMA RAYS in their Celani cell. If you had the means you could simply build one yourself, and Hans Biberian replicated their result within 48 hours. Then there’s the NANOR device available from Dr. Hagelstein of MIT. And if you dare, you could buy a Rossi reactor for $1.5M. That is 3 separate LENR groups openly selling their devices. We have turned a corner.


75 posted on 03/13/2014 1:29:30 AM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

based on before-and-after masses of the apparatus? Or based on gross mass?
***Why bother with something so touchy? Just base it on heat. You’ve got a cylinder of a certain size. You fill it with the highest energy density stuff you can find in our chemical universe. And you light it on fire. It produces the same amount of heat at, say 300 degrees C for 1 hour and runs out. Then you run one of these devices, it generates 320 degrees C for 10,000 hours before it gives out. (Actually, it didn’t give out. They just ended the test so they could get on with it).

What’s the energy density difference? It is at least 10 thousand X. Pretty simple, isn’t it. Even if you got an error here or there, at that scale it makes little difference.


76 posted on 03/13/2014 1:51:48 AM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson