[Cyber Liberty]

Chinless and the rest of the RINOs are hoping to reap what they sowed in the 2012 election, where TEA Party candidates lost because they were stiff-armed by the national Party. They are now saying, “See? If you run TEA Party candidates, they lose!” What they don’t want people to know is those candidates lost because they were sabotaged by the national Party’s election committees, not because they were “bad” candidates.

It’s like dropping a cinder block on a car from an overpass, and when the car crashes and burns, claiming it’s because they weren’t driving the car.

[T Ruth]

TEA Party candidates lost because they were stiff-armed by the national Party. They are now saying, “See? If you run TEA Party candidates, they lose!” What they don’t want people to know is those candidates lost because they were sabotaged by the national Party’s election committees, not because they were “bad” candidates.

I think your analysis is correct.