The HATED, EXEMPT do not like to be the focus
of their own-generated evil.
The “good news” is that she was able to go public. How many times has the CIA found enough dirt to silence a congressperson and get a report (or vote) changed?
It may not have happened yet, but the technology they have in place makes that a future certainty if it’s allowed to stay. And once they start down that path they can chip away at restrictions until they have free reign over all communication and significant power to change congressional oversight and even elections to get the congress they want. It may be a multi-year process or a multi-decade process depending on how corrupt congress and the CIA director are any point but things will never take a step backwards into the people’s favor.
I don’t care what safeguards and policies they have in place. The “opportunities” of these technologies are just too attractive for some people not to take advantage of - and we are talking about people who’s main job is being a spy and who honestly believe that increasing their capabilities will increase our safety.
Hows it feel to be a serf? only for a brief time I’m sure.
This reads like a John Semmens satire piece.
> “I think a lot of the privacy people perhaps don’t understand that we still occupy the role of the Great Satan,” Feinsten told NBCNews. She was responding to Obama unveiling new “privacy” laws— billed as oversight and reform— but which could expand the use of domestic monitoring in the name of making the “homeland” free, if not a little less brave.
Let me point out the obvious, Ms. Feinstein. We DO have Satan’s representative, the AntiChrist, leading this country.
The Narcissus-in-chief could not find enough people praising him from the NSA, he had to get the CIA to look at the Bolshies in Congress.