And I never said he did “ultimately support open borders”. Actually, I said he proposed his 3rd way plan in such a fashion that he could end up voting against open borders. His plan is never going to be implemented, never was, and was put forth as a means of separating himself from the GOP on the issue without having to vote with the Democrats. He gave himself cover for the inevitable “racist” charge, while getting to oppose the final bill. It was a good political move, but I would have preferred that he simply lead against the bill.
WHAT? I “quote” you, he did “ultimately support open borders”, and then you reply “And I never said he did “ultimately support open borders”. “
Say what?
“His plan is never going to be implemented, never was”
Au contraire, mon amie. After he is elected, the president’s agenda is often implemented. Obamacare anyone?
“cover for the inevitable “racist” charge”
Say What? Are you now insinuating that he is a “racist”? Actually his position is the exact opposite. He understands Hispanics on this. They are against amnesty, but for a legitimate solution. His positions will garner him many Hispanic votes, just the opposite for the anti-amnesty crowd.
Rand Paul is a good guy with legitimate ideas for reform.
Don’t bother with what his enemies have to say about him, see what he actually says about his own beliefs.