Skip to comments.
Rand Paul RIPS Ted Cruz: Sometimes People Think They're The Next Ronald Reagan (video)
RealClearPolitics ^
| March 10, 2014
| RealClearPolitics
Posted on 03/10/2014 7:45:11 PM PDT by i88schwartz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
" Levin or Palin needs to call both Cruz and Paul to the table and have them bury the hatchet, NOW. "
Yep, any way it turns out they're going to need each other.
And we need them both.
41
posted on
03/10/2014 10:25:09 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: chicagolady
Ok ,I now its hard to be smarter than a 5th grader so I will start you off, because I feel sorry for you Paulites streaming into the main auditorium to hear him rail against government overreach and neoconservativism on Friday afternoon. In many respects, his win in the CPAC poll seemed pre-ordained his band of followers having a well-earned reputation for flooding polls and forums like these. What it portends for a possible 2012 presidential run is anyones guess. Paul had a similar cult-like following during the 2008 election, only to garner a relatively small chunk of the actual vote. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/20/cpac-2010-straw-poll-resu_n_470319.html No Go to sleep its past your bedtime. No, no, no - you misunderstood. I didn't say please spew childish insults because I dared asked you to present evidence for your slander about stuffing ballot boxes.
What I said was, please provide the evidence.
You know, evidence - the thing you can't provide.
The thing you replace with a filthy mouth.
Evidence.
42
posted on
03/10/2014 10:33:17 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Talisker
So let's see some links to YOUR lunatic contentions. Rand got 31%
Leagalize pot got 33%
Must be a coincidence.
43
posted on
03/11/2014 12:24:03 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: SoConPubbie
someone who doesn't understand the meaning of constitutional. At the present time it means what ever it needs to mean.
44
posted on
03/11/2014 12:28:01 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: i88schwartz
Hannity was stoking the fires between Paul and Cruz, on his show last night. No need to do that!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sometimes people think they’re the next Ross Perot.
46
posted on
03/11/2014 4:20:31 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: MinuteGal
Better libertarians than Rino’s.
48
posted on
03/11/2014 6:56:11 AM PDT
by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: Bushbacker1
Rand Paul has been standing up (literally) for the Constitution for quite a few years, especially with regard to the second amendment.
I've seen little to suggest he won't continue to uphold and defend the Constitution, which makes him threat to the vast majority of the Federal GuvCo.
So, yes, I tend to trust him.
On the other hand, noting your handle here, I don't trust the Bush family and place a great deal of blame on GWB for the great American Lockdown we now have.
No more kinder, gentler marxists rinos!!
49
posted on
03/11/2014 7:00:54 AM PDT
by
GBA
(Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: itsahoot
LOL, so voting, itself, is treachery because it’s impossible that so many people could disagree with you.
LOL, m’kay. Sure simplifies things, I’ll give you that!
50
posted on
03/11/2014 11:33:16 AM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson