Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sodpoodle

“but it is always possible that it landed without exploding- in a sparsely populated area; not in the ocean.”

A landing requires roughly 8,000 feet of runway. Plus there are likely five or more radios on board, not to mention cell phones if they’re in range of a tower. It’s very unlikely to have landed unless it was hijacked to, say, North Korea. If that were the case, probably the various intelligence agencies monitoring NK would know already as NK is probably under continuous surveillance by one or more countries.

Undoubtedly, most western nations have turned on their satellite cameras as they passed the area in an effort to garner clues. The automatic picture review would spot something that size if it were not there yesterday and flag it. No, most likely, it went down in the water. It could have gone down in dense jungle and also completely disappear, provided it did not burn.


5 posted on 03/09/2014 12:45:33 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

I am going with the pilot going to the can and the 27 year old co-pilot turning the plane nose down and plunging it into the ocean.


6 posted on 03/09/2014 12:52:40 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Insurgent Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather

Have they determined if the oil slick is fuel dumped from the Malaysia Jet? That would indicate the pilots knew they were in trouble & planning a hard landing (or a skilled Sully) - but to not report a problem is very strange. Too many abnormal circumstances to be considered a ‘routine’ accident.


7 posted on 03/09/2014 1:00:45 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson