To: servantboy777; txhurl; JRandomFreeper
Not quite a landslide, indeed.
Look at the millions McCornball had to spend just to get that 59%. Not to mention the fact that we/he had no well known, well funded, well organized candidate to go up against him.
340 posted on
03/05/2014 7:24:46 AM PST by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: Jane Long
What is the potential now for the Dem to win with a Clintonian plurality if Dems can put a lot of money into a libertarian candidate (like Va. governor)?
342 posted on
03/05/2014 8:33:39 AM PST by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: Jane Long
Lyndon B. Johnson got 59 percent in the general election of 1960 against John Tower, who gained exposure for the special election of 1961. The big beneficiaries of Cornball’s success are McC and Graham.
345 posted on
03/05/2014 3:54:57 PM PST by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Jane Long
The press declared Eisenhower’s 55 to 56 percent in 1952 a “landslide”.
346 posted on
03/05/2014 3:55:38 PM PST by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson