Posted on 03/03/2014 12:13:24 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
As the Putin regime invades Ukraine, it has become apparent that a new force for evil has emerged in Moscow. It is essential that Americans become aware of the nature of the threat.
Putin is sometimes described as a revanchist, seeking to recreate the Soviet Union. That is a useful shorthand, but it is not really accurate. Putin and many of his gang may have once been Communists, but they are not that today. Rather, they have embraced a new totalitarian political ideology known as “Eurasianism.”
The roots of Eurasianism go back to czarist émigrés interacting with fascist thinkers in between-the-wars France and Germany. But in recent years, its primary exponent has been the very prominent and prolific political theorist Aleksandr Dugin.
Born in 1962, Dugin was admitted to the Moscow Aviation Institute in 1979, but then was expelled because of his involvement with mystic neo-Nazi groups. He then spent the Eighties hanging around monarchist and ultra-right-wing circles, before joining for a while Gennady Ziuganov’s Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF, a neo-Stalinist group partially descended from, but not to be confused with, the previously ruling Communist Party of the Soviet Union, CPSU), after which he became a founder and chief ideologue of the Eurasianist National Bolshevik Party (NBP) in 1994.
Nazism, it will be recalled, was an abbreviation for National Socialism. National Bolshevism, therefore, put itself forth as an ideology that relates to National Socialism in much the same way as Bolshevism relates to Socialism. This open self-identification with Nazism is also shown clearly in the NBP flag, which looks exactly like a Nazi flag, with a red background surrounding a white circle, except that the black swastika at the center is replaced by a black hammer and sickle.
Dugin ran for the Duma on the NBP ticket in 1995, but got only 1 percent of the vote. So, switching tactics, he abandoned the effort to build his own splinter party and instead adopted the more productive strategy of becoming the idea man for all the bigger parties, including Putin’s United Russia, Ziuganov’s CPRF, and Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s ultranationalist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia. In this role he has succeeded brilliantly.
The core idea of Dugin’s Eurasianism is that “liberalism” (by which is meant the entire Western consensus) represents an assault on the traditional hierarchical organization of the world. Repeating the ideas of Nazi theorists Karl Haushofer, Rudolf Hess, Carl Schmitt, and Arthur Moeller van der Bruck, Dugin says that this liberal threat is not new, but is the ideology of the maritime cosmopolitan power “Atlantis,” which has conspired to subvert more conservative land-based societies since ancient times. Accordingly, he has written books in which he has reconstructed the entire history of the world as a continuous battle between these two factions, from Rome v. Carthage to Russia v. the Anglo Saxon “Atlantic Order,” today. If Russia is to win this fight against the subversive oceanic bearers of such “racist” (because foreign-imposed) ideas as human rights, however, it must unite around itself all the continental powers, including Germany, Central and Eastern Europe, the former Soviet republics, Turkey, Iran, and Korea, into a grand Eurasian Union strong enough to defeat the West.
In order to be so united, this Eurasian Union will need a defining ideology, and for this purpose Dugin has developed a new “Fourth Political Theory” combining all the strongest points of Communism, Nazism, Ecologism, and Traditionalism, thereby allowing it to appeal to the adherents of all of these diverse anti-liberal creeds. He would adopt Communism’s opposition to free enterprise. However, he would drop the Marxist commitment to technological progress, a liberal-derived ideal, in favor of Ecologism’s demagogic appeal to stop the advance of industry and modernity. From Traditionalism, he derives a justification for stopping free thought. All the rest is straight out of Nazism, ranging from legal theories justifying unlimited state power and the elimination of individual rights, to the need for populations “rooted” in the soil, to weird gnostic ideas about the secret origin of the Aryan race in the North Pole.
The open devotion to Nazism is Dugin’s thought is remarkable. In his writings he celebrates the Waffen SS, murderers of millions of Russians during the war, as an ideal organization. He also approves of the most extreme crimes of Communism, going so far as to endorse the horrific 1937 purges that killed, among numerous other talented and loyal Soviet citizens, nearly the entire leadership of the Red Army — something that Stalin himself later had second thoughts about.
What Russia needs, says Dugin, is a “genuine, true, radically revolutionary and consistent, fascist fascism.” On the other hand, “Liberalism, is an absolute evil. . . . Only a global crusade against the U.S., the West, globalization, and their political-ideological expression, liberalism, is capable of becoming an adequate response. . . . The American empire should be destroyed.”
This is the ideology behind the Putin regime’s “Eurasian Union” project. It is to this dark program, which threatens not only the prospects for freedom in Ukraine and Russia, but the peace of the world, that former Ukrainian president Victor Yanukovych tried to sell “his” country. It is against this program that the courageous protesters in the Maidan took their stand and — with scandalously little help from the West — somehow miraculously prevailed. But now the chips are really down. The Ukrainians are being faced not with riot police, but with Russian divisions, subversion, and economic warfare. The country needs to be stabilized, and defended. The Ukrainians deserve our full support — and not just for reasons of sympathy for those resisting tyranny or respect for the brave. It is in the vital interest of America that freedom triumphs in Ukraine.
Without Ukraine, Dugin’s fascist Eurasian Union project is impossible, and sooner or later Russia itself will have to join the West and become free, leaving only a few despised and doomed islands of tyranny around the globe. But with Ukraine underfoot, the Eurasianists’ program can and will proceed, and a new Iron Curtain will fall into place imprisoning a large fraction of humanity in the grip of a monstrous totalitarian power that will become the arsenal of evil around the world for decades to come. That means another Cold War, trillions of dollars wasted on arms, accelerated growth of the national-security state at home, repeated proxy conflicts costing millions of lives abroad, and civilization itself placed at risk should a single misstep in the endless insane great-power game precipitate the locked and loaded confrontation into a thermonuclear exchange.
The 20th century saw three great-power confrontations. Two of them turned into total war. We lucked out on the third. Do we really want to roll those dice again? We will have to, unless the Eurasianist program is stopped.
The stakes in Ukraine could not be higher.
Putin and Solzhenitsyn were pals? When? I mean are you kidding me? Provide an inkling of proof. There are too many years between them and Solzhenitsyn despised Peter the Great. He wanted Russia to stop being imperialistic under the commies and under a post commie government.
Blame America first is what liberals do, not Americans.
Is Ukraine worth a carrier battle group? A division of US troops? How about several radioactive holes that use to be cities?
Russia has the advantage in tactical nuclear weapons. We have no way to win this one, and everything to lose. Literally.
I’m just trying to get a handle on how badly the U.S. needs to handcuff itself regarding foreign affairs in order to make people like us.
Do you think Putin just woke up and decided to invade Ukraine? What was his motivation?
This is not really true. Putin wants to recreate not the USSR but to the contrary, to make Russia the bastion of Orthodox Christian civilization - in other words, to succeed with Christianity where Communism failed. And he sees a decadent, dissolute, morally confused and weak West. Not a role model for the Slavs.
He wants to renew Russia not in the spirit of Marx but in the spirit of Byzantium and he sees Russia as the heir to the Romans who once ruled from Constantinople.
Interesting read...
But Russia’s attempts to expand into the fading Ottoman Empire- opposed by Europe in the “Great Game” - is a clear exposition of what’s happening now. “Warm water ports”.
History: we can learn from it or we can repeat it.
It relies on one word being found in Dugin's writings and in Putin's program.
Russia is a "Eurasian" country. Hence, the word "Eurasia" may very well appear in Russian writing and thinking in a variety of contexts, some benign, some malignant.
I really wish Zubrin had done more research. He'd find "Eurasian" thinking going back a century, heir to "Slavophilism" and "Sythianism" in Russian culture.
There's much in that way of thinking that could be regarded as malevolent, but the word can also be used in a neutral, geographical sense.
I'm not aware that the Russian equivalent of the word "Eurasian" means fascism or adherence to Dugin's ideology.
As a former superpower, Russian wants to have friendly neighbors and some influence over its neighbors. Russian ambitions may be dangerous, but to associate them with totalitarianism is to overreact in an extreme way.
Just a wild guess. Maybe that is the plan.
US destroyed and biblical prophecy to come true.
However, the article is reflective of the Neo Con point of view and thus, the Western point of view.
It's the real Culture War. And, I'm not sure how to overcome it as the Neo Cons are entrenched.
They want another Cold War, at least.
If it had anything to do with those timeless values we would be in the Central African Republic protecting the folks there.
Make no mistake, this is about money, power and geography to control more of those.
It's about the Western World Order encroaching on the Eastern World Order...and vice versa.
Same sh!t, different century.
Sometimes Godwin's Law is a farcical stretch. Sometimes the comparison with Hitler's program of aggression fits. In this situation, the comparison is valid.
What I’m trying to get a handle on is why America is supposed to give a flip about this. Is it our sacred duty to interfere everywhere it’s not our business?
Neocon yahoos have never heard of Byzantium. Or Christianity.
Czar Putin may not be a National Bolshevik like Aleksandr Dugin, but he a Eurasianist , a revanchist (one bent of revenge as an ideology) and an irredentist (one who seeks to incorporate cross border members of ones ethnic group). Russia is in no position to play the Stalinist “my opponent is a fascist” card.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.