Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal The 17th
There are a lot of steps short of war we could take, but they would have to be ultimately backed by a credible use of force, and not necessarily in the Ukraine itself.

I have very little regard for the capabilities of the Russian armed forces, and know from history that the Russians often bluff and will back down when directly confronted. Our passivity is what is making them more aggressive.

159 posted on 03/03/2014 9:49:38 AM PST by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3128814/posts?page=35#35


160 posted on 03/03/2014 9:51:49 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: pierrem15; Repeal The 17th; annalex; All

I suspect that NATO’s fear is that Russia can simply turn off the gas. It is still winter, too...

That said, and perhaps someone can answer this: Is not France (by virtue of its nuclear power plants and expanded oil / gas from Libya) somewhat less dependent on Russian gas? France did sign on to at least one, if not more, of the Security Assurances when the Ukraine gave up its nukes. Perhaps France could act unilaterally to assist the Ukraine? Putin would be on pretty thin ice if he tried shutting down gas to Europe because of what the French were doing.

The question then might be, outside of “prestige”, “what’s in it for France?”


165 posted on 03/03/2014 3:44:37 PM PST by Paul R. (Leftists desire to control everything; In the end they invariably control nothing worth a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson