Please provide a legitimate citation for the 4 million republican voters sitting out (I assume you refer to the most recent presidential election).
I’m not challenging the idea that 100% dem turnout anywhere is realistic, much less if it were 100% rep turnout anywhere either. I just want to see a good citation that shows 4 million R voters sat out the presidential election.
Pardon me for not putting this common truism in quotes and giving attribution, and perhaps even expanding the numbers through hyperbole, and not putting up a /s or other sarcasm tag.
In reality, while Romney garnered an estimated 800,000 fewer votes than McCain (likely Palin) had received, Obama got almost 7 million fewer votes than he had in 2008. They were just located where the electoral votes were. Source: here. I hope no one had accepted that number as correct, and thank you for challenging it.
I am sick and tired of people blaming "absent Republicans" (people who did not vote for Romney out of conscience, moral or other convictions--or because they knew he would carry their state anyway and get the electoral votes, regardless) for electing Obama again (circular firing squad) when in all likelihood, the critical votes were simply not counted--votes which could have made enough difference to elect Romney instead of Obama, while 'extra' votes for Obama were racked up in strategic precincts.
It is not my personal contention that any Republican voters sat anything out and caused Obama to win, but that the election was likely stolen through the use of various fraudulent means in critical precincts in critical states.