Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster

she said it was too broad so make it more specific and “inclusive” of non-religious objections.

No person shall be required to participate or endorse sexual conduct which they find offensive to their conscience.

IOW narrow on just behavior. Homosexuality is ONLY about recreational sex. This also includes polygamists, animal sex people, wife swappers, fetish people etc...


103 posted on 02/27/2014 7:10:24 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

“No person shall be required to participate or endorse sexual conduct which they find offensive to their conscience.”

That I think would be an interesting way to write the law. The left will still yell and scream but this is concise and specific. Still may not do the trick but it would be interesting


107 posted on 02/27/2014 7:18:19 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson