Correct. But my point was/is , that right already exists in Arizona. There is no law requiring businesses to take part in anything or service anyone. Businesses already have this standing by way of exclusion in the law.
This comes across as grandstanding and makes the GOP look like hate mongering idiots and they don’t need the help. It’s a colossal waste of time and money to codify something that already exists within the law.
You may be right but someone in the AZ legislature doesn't think so. One woman from AZ described it as a "process law." I don't know what that means but she said it only had to do with giving a businessman standing in court. Sorry, that's not very illuminating but it was the best attempt I've heard or read at explaining the purpose of the law.
Another state rep from AZ was on Fox News this morning and said that originally this law had nothing to do with homosexuals but that it has been made to look that way by the press. It's not hard to believe that but he didn't have time to give explanatory details.