This is an AZ issues and in AZ we have not had these issues. The law would get more support if and when the issue becomes relevant. But really the bottom line is if you going to pass a controversial law like this you need to get out in front of it and sell it properly and not hide from it as the AZ Republicans that supported and passed the law did. Plus, if you going to send a rep to debate the law with the MSM, have someone better versed and prepared than the buffoon that went on Anderson Cooper.
Show me the evidence that the people of AZ think 1062 was irrelevant. 1062 had the same supportive language of religion as the First Amendment. In addition to the federal government, 18 states have such statutes and about a dozen other states interpret their state constitutions as extending the same protections. Please stop covering up for the spinelessness of the RINO's of AZ!
Do you actually think they would put someone on that would articulate well the supportive argument, especially without editing the interview?
Even with someone who can articulate the reasons for 1062, this is the tactic that will be shown by the interviewer after what's left on the editing floor:
A, mischaracterize it.
B, call it gay bashing.
C, attach it to the Republicans and make 'em out to be the usual racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes.
D, scare them into paralysis.
E, we get what we want -- and what we want is this Constitution shredded and bastardized every chance we get.