Then why do you think there was this effort to pass 1062 in the first place. Do you actually think that religious freedoms have not been erroded over the past few years?
In fact, the case the left made against 1062 is that it was discriminatory against homosexuals when NO MENTION of homosexuallity was in 1062. If the case of the left is valid, it is valid to think that ANYTHING religious - or any religion for that matter - is discriminatory, and thus should be illegal!
” Do you actually think that religious freedoms have not been erroded over the past few years?”
Not really, no. As a Christian, I haven’t seen the effects some people are concerned about. I’m fairly strong on the separation of church and state, myself.
While 1062 didn’t mention homosexuality implicitly, wasn’t that the main source of it, in terms of reasons? Religious freedom was already protected in AZ, and there are no provisions against discrimination for sexual orientation on the books in the state either....so...what was the point of this?