I understand yours and others viewpoints.
IMHO, the major point of contention between us is the differing level of tolerance each of has for silently allowing elected Republicans to act as submissive doormats for violators of the US Constitution.
IOW, what level of tolerance does each of us have, when exceeded, will put the elected Republicans who do nothing to oppose violations of the US Constitution in the category of “Do Nothing RINOs?”
My level of “Do Nothing RINOs,” (DNR), tolerance was forever exceeded during the Primary Campaign of 2012.
I will not vote for anymore Do Nothing RINOs again.
I shall just leave their slots blank on the ballot, as there is no effective difference between a Do Nothing RINO and a Democrat.
At each time, during the past five years of critical voting, the Do Nothing RINOs in the House and Senate have voted with the Democrats to approve the violation of the US Constitution being voted on.
Their usual defeatist whine is: “We can’t do anything because we do not have control of the Senate or White House.”
The Do Nothing RINOs were given FIVE years to do something and did nothing.
Now it is our turn.
IOW, The Do Nothing RINOs and the Democrats vote together as a single, unshakable voting block to rubber-stamp whatever Obama want to do to “Fundamentally Change the United States of America.”
It is as I suspected. We’re not very far apart in our beliefs and strategy over all. But our individual terminology on the other hand may need some forethought before replying to posted comments.