To: Stanwood_Dave
It's good to see that someone else is arguing that the Congressional power grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water implies that private citizens would have military arms, including the 18th century weapon of mass destruction, the cannon. And that power predated the second amendment.
6 posted on
02/25/2014 11:14:19 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
To: KarlInOhio
“It’s good to see that someone else is arguing that the Congressional power grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water implies that private citizens would have military arms, including the 18th century weapon of mass destruction, the cannon. And that power predated the second amendment.”
Unfortunately or not, that backs up the argument for penumbra in the Constitution.
25 posted on
02/25/2014 12:46:58 PM PST by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson