Posted on 02/25/2014 5:20:07 AM PST by Daffynition
Gun confiscations is one step closer in Connecticut. The mainstream media spins it as one more chance for non-compliant gun owners who failed to register their scary guns before the January 1 deadline.
In reality, these letters - 106 to rifle owners, and 108 more to residents with standard capacity magazines are the first step in the Connecticut State Police beginning to round up guns arbitrarily made illegal last year in that state. These guns include Americas favorite rifle, the AR-15 and magazines over 10 rounds, which include the standard capacity magazines made for that Americas favorite rifle.
Failure to register is now a felony now in Connecticut.
How long will it be before there is bloodshed over this law? Were not sure, but were confident it is coming unless the law is rescinded or struck down by the courts.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanlibertyriders.ning.com ...
From your keyboard to God’s ears.
That’s a shame. Now look up the Doctrine of One Hundred Heads for those who will be held accountable when the first victim is put down for his or her God given rights.
CT Senators, House members names/photos/addresses/phone numbers who decided to support tyranny:
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-sipsey-street-public-service.html
Lists go both ways. And tyrannical decisions get mighty painful when they come with personal consequences.
Ruger and any other gun company should have been out of CT by now. So far, I don’t see where CT has paid any price for their sedition.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Get out of Red England before they blow the bridges over the Hudson and leave you trapped.
5.56mm
I am here but to serve.
;<)
Gretchen’s sister.
Not anymore.
Once you make people felons, they have nothing left to lose. Never pick a fight with someone who has nothing to lose.
What the hell is that? Perhaps a flaming fascist fag?
Go Get’em Boys !
[conspiracy-theory][cynic]
That's because the NRA can drive up more scare-membership and scare-donations if there is actual gun confiscation — this is why they never go on the offensive: to do so would mean that they would have to change their tactics/MO/goals (just like why the GOP doesn't oppose the Democrats).
[/cynic][/conspiracy-theory]
I think you mean this:
Tyrannidem per omnia, saecula saeculorum
[Translation]
Makes this particularly relevant wouldn't you say?
"Without me my rifle is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will..."
“Though a state felony conviction in CT becomes a felony in every state where legally possessing a firearm is concerned.”
Exactly so. Federal law (the ‘68 GCA) states that a person is not permitted to purchase or possess a firearm if they have been convicted of a felony anywhere. A “felony” is a crime punishable by more than 365 days in jail, regardless of whether one is sentenced to the full term or actually serves even 1 second in jail. Note that this also includes felonies in foreign countries - there’s a US Supreme Court case in which the ruling disallowed the 2nd Amendment rights of a guy who crossed into Mexico with empty shell casings of “impermissible” rounds (i.e. 9mm), since the crime in Mexico had a penalty of more than a year.
Note, folks, that there are over 10,000 felonies on the books - they mean to take your gun and voting rights away if you resist the regime (state or federal) in any way.
Paging Claire Wolfe: is it time yet?
Someone needs to put together a list of CT-based businesses to boycott. I’ll start the list off with:
Colt Defense LLC
Colt’s Manufacturing Co
Conntech Products Corp
GE Credit Union
Gunx LLC
Marlin Firearms Co
O F Mossberg & Sons Inc
Sturm Ruger & Co INc
United States Fire Arms Mfg Co
Wildey Guns
Source: http://www.armsdealer.net/businesses/category/gun-manufacturers/connecticut
Let’s not forget misdemeanor convictions of ‘domestic violence’ that are so often charged against some poor jerk by a wife who needs to make a divorce case stick (not saying there aren’t abusively violent spouses of either gender who actually pummel their significant others)
The people who need to be boycotted in CT are the politicians who voted yes. Get them OUT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.