To: P-Marlowe
But, his summary of the history is actually quite accurate. And Trenton was more than symbolic - it led to Princeton and basically driving the Brits back to NYC. Washington knew how weak his situation and picked his battles, often tricking Brits (as in after Trenton) into thinking he was still around when he actually left. He never shirked from a battle, only too anxious for it, but he wasn’t stupid.
I am skeptical of Cruz. I could swear he did something “unconservative” recently. I really don’t trust anyone in politics to be really “conservative”.
99 posted on
02/21/2014 10:14:30 AM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
To: the OlLine Rebel; xzins
Trenton was a Hail Mary pass and Washington literally had his back to the wall. If he didn't post a victory before the end of the year, the war was over. Most of the troops' enlistments were due to expire in about two weeks and without a military victory, congress was not going to pony up the money to pay for reenlistments. Congress would have sued for peace and Georhe Washington would have been drawn and quartered on the lawn of the Tower of London with George III presiding. It was a do or die mission.
The victory provided impetus for the war to continue. Although it did little to destroy the British presence, it did much to embolden the Americans in their continued fight. In that respect, it was a highly symbolic victory.
103 posted on
02/21/2014 10:56:12 AM PST by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson