There you go again. Now you are calling me an idiot. The ACT of carrying a gun is ACTING. You have a choice of whether to ACT that way or not. It is something you DO as opposed to something you ARE.
It is my prerogative to prescribe what can and what cannot be done on my property. You have no right to carry a gun on my property without my permission. You have no right to be on my property without my permission. If I invite the public to my property, I can still dictate what they may do and how they may ACT on my property. I cannot dictate the color of their skin. That is, in fact, illegal.
I can, and do carry weapons on my property. I do carry weapons on other peoples property if they don't ask me not to do so. If they ask me not to do so, I have the choice to leave the weapon at home or not visit their property. I would think a consistent conservative would support a property owners' right to control who does what on his property. God did not give you an inalienable right to enter my property armed if I object.
I understand the word perfectly. You are either displaying your ignorance, or your stubbornness. Either way, you are incorrect.
“You have no right to carry a gun on my property without my permission.”
You have no right to invite me onto your property but then expect to check my pockets. Again, you claim rights to your property but then expect to violate the property rights of everyone else. Persons are the ultimate property for which you think you have a right to violate.
Liberal thinking: “I get to do what I want and you have to let me without regard to what you want.” “Rules for thee but not for me.”